Quantcast
Home / News (page 1172) /

News

00-2136-CR State v. Ransom

Sebastian C. Ransom appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Ransom asserts that he should be allowed to withdraw his no ...

Read More »

00-2459-CR State v. Luedke

Daniel Luedke appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of felony impersonating a peace officer and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Luedke argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. ...

Read More »

00-3101-CR, 00-3102-CR State v. Sackatook

Frank Sackatook, Jr., appeals judgments convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child and burglary. He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion ...

Read More »

00-1027 In Re the Marriage of: Kuper v. Kuper

Petitioner Leslie L. Kuper appeals from a court order finding her liable to her ex-husband, respondent Craig A. Kuper, for $40,184, representing back taxes, interest, and penalties assessed against Craig by the state and federal governments. Leslie also contends that ...

Read More »

01-0102-CR State v. Vue

Pha Vue appeals his judgment of conviction for two counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide. Vue argues the trial court erred as a matter of law by: (1) determining that Vue’s statement was admissible even though it was taken after ...

Read More »

00-2669 Friedman, et al. v. Stueber, et al.

David Friedman appeals a summary judgment dismissing his insurer, USAA Casualty Insurance Co. He contends that his USAA uninsured and underinsured motorist policy covers his injuries because they were caused by an accident. Alternatively, Friedman argues that summary judgment should ...

Read More »

00-2304-CR State v. Porter

Crystal Porter appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on her guilty plea to keeping or maintaining a drug house, and from an order denying her request for postconviction relief. Porter claims: (1) she did not voluntarily consent to the ...

Read More »

99-8508 Kyllo v. United States

“[I]n the case of the search of the interior of homes – the prototypical and hence most commonly litigated area of protected privacy – there is a ready criterion, with roots deep in the common law, of the minimal expectation ...

Read More »

00-2792-CR State v. Rodgriguez

Angel Rodriguez appeals, following a jury trial, from a judgment convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide and burglary, both while armed with a dangerous weapon, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Rodriguez claims he was ...

Read More »

00-1663Luder v. Endicott

“The plaintiffs are seeking to accomplish exactly what they would accomplish were they allowed to maintain this suit against the state and did so successfully: they are seeking to force the state to accede to their view of the Act ...

Read More »

00-2839 Johnson Bank v. Brandon Apparel

“Here, the parties submitted affidavits with conflicting statements as to whether an oral agreement existed. While the trial court may have considered the parties’ affidavits, some matters are ‘too grave to be decided on affidavits.’ [Citation]. Unless the facts are ...

Read More »

00-1784-CR State v. Handal

Eduardo D. Handal appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Handal received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we agree with the circuit ...

Read More »

No. 105Kansas v. Colorado

“At one point in time, the fact that the claim was unliquidated would have been of substantial importance… This common-law distinction has long since lost its hold on the legal imagination. Beginning in the early part of the last century, ...

Read More »

00-1663Luder v. Endicott (55270)

“The plaintiffs are seeking to accomplish exactly what they would accomplish were they allowed to maintain this suit against the state and did so successfully: they are seeking to force the state to accede to their view of the Act ...

Read More »

01-0444-FT City of Brookfield v. Ulmen

The City of Brookfield appeals from an order dismissing two uniform traffic citations that charged Daniel D. Ulmen with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) respectively. The dismissal ...

Read More »

00-3897Otto v. SEC

“[W]e need not decide the issue of whether the NASD is a state actor in this case because Otto admitted all of the facts necessary to establish his guilt, which dooms his due process arguments.” “Given Otto’s admissions coupled with ...

Read More »

00-3013-CR State v. Martin

Richard Martin pled guilty to operating while under the influence of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. sec. 346.63(1)(a). He appeals his conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin ...

Read More »

01-2441Garza v. Lappin

“Nothing in the OAS Charter suggests an intention that member states will be bound by the Commission’s decisions before the American Convention goes into effect. To the contrary, the OAS Charter’s reference to the Convention shows that the signatories to ...

Read More »