Quantcast
Home / News (page 1110) /

News

01-0707-CR State v. Schulte

Corey Schulte appeals a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test administered ...

Read More »

00-2754 In Re the Marriage of: Charles R.H. v. Mary E.H.: In the Interest of Jason M.H., In the Interest of the Guardianship and Mental Commitment of Jason M. H.: Waukesha County v. Dodge County

Waukesha County appeals a circuit court order concluding that Jason H., an incompetent with a guardian, is a resident of Waukesha County for purposes of determining which county is responsible for funding Jason H.’s protective placement care. Waukesha County seeks ...

Read More »

01-1044-CR State v. Eckola

William Eckola was convicted of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, sixth offense. The State argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by placing Eckola on probation without requiring him to serve at least the ...

Read More »

01-1619-CR State v. Ross

Ryan Ross appeals from a judgment of conviction, following his guilty plea, for possession of a controlled substance. Ross contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Specifically, Ross argues that his “Fourth Amendment rights were ...

Read More »

01-0939 Mulqueen, et al. v. Geller

Daniel Geller appeals from the judgment entered against him on March 2, 2001 granting a judgment of eviction to the plaintiff, Michael T. Mulqueen, et al., and terminating all of Geller’s contractual rights under four leases. Geller raises three issues ...

Read More »

00-1128 Flores-Leon v. INS

“We join the First and the Ninth Circuits in concluding that Congress has clearly manifested an intent to apply the amended definition of ‘aggravated felony’ retroactively… Section 321 of IIRIRA contains a clear and express directive from Congress that the ...

Read More »

00-3201 Berghauer, et al. v. Heyl, et al.

This appeal arises from a judgment following a jury verdict in a medical malpractice case. Dr. Bruce Heyl, St. Elizabeth Hospital, and their respective insurance companies (collectively, Heyl and St. Elizabeth), argue that (1) insufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict ...

Read More »

99-2722, 99-2765 U.S. v. Williams, et al.

“The district court here found the government’s reasons to be adequate and race-neutral. We agree that the reason stated is clear, specific and related to the case. The government had some information that Juror P could be related to a ...

Read More »

00-3366-CR State v. Seely

Kenneth J. Seely appeals from a judgment convicting him of three counts of substantial battery with intent to commit bodily harm, second-degree sexual assault and intimidating a victim and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. On ...

Read More »

01-0433 Volden v. Koenig, et al.

“The attorney general interpreted this paragraph in determining whether a Wis. Stat. § 51.20 detainee was a patient subject to the right to be free from physical restraint while in the custody of the sheriff pending an involuntary commitment hearing. ...

Read More »

00-3432-CR State v. Hennings

Charles E. Hennings appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of felony murder. Hennings also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Hennings argues that the circuit court erred in ...

Read More »

00-3977 U.S. v. Duvall

“We believe that the government’s notice did not adequately summarize or describe Erk’s trial testimony. The Rule requires a summary of the expected testimony, not a list of topics. The government’s notice provided a list of the general subject matters ...

Read More »

01-1177 State v. Fields

“In this case, we agree with Fields that the information filed on October 2 was woefully inadequate and failed to technically comply with the pleading requirements of Wis. Stat. § 973.12(1) as interpreted by the Gerard court. The information, by ...

Read More »

01-0718-CR State v. Jarvey

Leland Jarvey appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder. Jarvey seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it admitted other acts evidence that Jarvey allegedly ...

Read More »

00-1241 U.S. v. Seward

“The district court’s bare holding that Seward was ‘being untruthful’ falls short of even a liberal application of Dunnigan. Although the district court’s ruling certainly indicates that the court found one element of perjury, false testimony, and read generously, could ...

Read More »

01-1136 State v. Carlson

Although the juror himself said that he did not understand English well enough to competently hear the case, we conclude that the trial court properly considered all the evidence that informed on Vera’s ability to comprehend English, and found that ...

Read More »

01-0055-CR State v. Hicks

Aaron Hicks appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual assault with an unconscious person, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did not consult an ...

Read More »

00-1045 TRW, Inc. v. Andrews

“Congress provided in the FCRA that the two-year statute of limitations runs from ‘the date on which the liability arises” subject to a single exception for cases involving a defendant’s willful misrepresentation of material information. sec. 1681p. The most natural ...

Read More »