What Happens If You’re Partially at Fault in a Hit-and-Run?

Listen to this article

No one wants to be involved in an accident, let alone a hit-and-run. A straightforward car accident is difficult enough to handle, but a hit-and-run can be even more stressful, especially if your actions played a part in the accident. And the question begs, would you qualify for any compensation for injury or loss?

It might surprise you that you may qualify to claim for loss and/or injury. When fault is assigned, it needs to be established how much of it is yours and how it would affect the final outcome for compensation.

Read on to learn what it means to be partially at fault and how to handle it.

Understanding Partial Fault in Hit-and-Run Accidents

Someone is at fault when it comes to an accident, but it can also be classified as a partial fault. More than one driver could have made a mistake that culminated in an accident, for example, not paying full attention, not signaling, or speeding.

When a person leaves the scene of an accident without giving their information or assistance, it is called a hit-and-run. If someone broke the law by fleeing the accident, there most probably would still be a review of everyone involved.

An insurance company might assess the situation and conclude that you were 20% to blame for an accident. Such a percentage is important because insurance companies, as well as the courts, can divide the claim as they see fit. This can affect any payout, even if one of the parties did not remain at the scene of the accident.

How Comparative Fault Affects Your Case

Comparative fault laws decide how shared blame affects your ability to be compensated after a crash. These laws vary by state and fall into two types: pure and modified.

In states with pure comparative fault, you can recover money no matter to what extent you are at fault, even if it’s 90% your fault. But this also means that you will get a lower percentage of compensation that would match your part of the blame. Depending on the local laws in modified comparative fault states, you might only be able to claim an amount of up to 50 or 51%.

Here is an example: You will receive $7000 if the damage is $10,000 and if you are found to be 30% at fault.

When the other driver is not there to tell their story in a hit-and-run case, it is more difficult to establish fault. That means more pressure is put on your story, the police report, and any available evidence.

Settlement Possibilities in Partial Fault Hit-and-Run Cases

When a driver is an uninsured motorist (UM) or an underinsured motorist (UIM), settling cases is usually dependent on their insurance coverage. When the other driver can not be found or has no insurance, this part of the policy would be activated.

An insurer might do their best to lower the payout to you by claiming that you were at fault; however, UM coverage often helps pay for your injuries or damages.

You might also be able to process a claim through the other driver’s insurance if the hit-and-run driver is identified at a later stage. When this happens, it means two insurance companies are involved, which often causes the settlement process to be complex.

Since there’s no second driver present right away, your insurance company may argue more aggressively that you were at fault so they can pay you less. That’s why having clear evidence and being ready for negotiation is key.

When and Why These Cases Go to Trial

Sometimes, a hit-and-run case involving partial fault ends up in court. This usually happens when the insurance company either denies the claim completely or offers a payout that seems far too low. The main reason is often a disagreement over how much fault is yours versus the missing driver’s.

Since hit-and-runs often lack clear evidence, proving what happened can be tough. If there are no witnesses or camera footage, it’s your word against the unknown driver who isn’t even there. In these cases, your car accident attorney may need to bring in accident reconstruction experts or locate any possible eyewitnesses to back up your version of events.

If the damages — like medical bills or lost income — are high and the insurance company refuses to settle fairly, going to trial might be your best chance at full compensation. The court will then look at all evidence and decide how fault should be shared.

Legal and Practical Considerations

If you try to process a hit-and-run when you are partially responsible, it can be very difficult, and this is where a skilled attorney can play a crucial role. An attorney can protect you when insurance companies try to shift more blame to you.

Laws vary in different states, but it remains important to make sure you meet deadlines by filing claims or lawsuits and make sure you are following the statutes of limitation. These statutes vary by state; one wouldn’t want to lose your chance to submit your compensation, but missing them can mean losing your chance at compensation.

If you don’t have uninsured motorist coverage, your financial recovery options may be limited.

Conclusion

Being partially at fault in a hit-and-run doesn’t end your case. You still have options. Whether you settle or go to trial depends on how fault is divided and the strength of your evidence.

A good lawyer can help you navigate the process toward the best possible outcome.

The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal, financial, medical, or professional advice. Readers should not rely solely on the content of this article and are encouraged to seek professional advice tailored to their specific circumstances. We disclaim any liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of, or reliance on, the information presented.