In this case, we return to a topic that we have addressed twice in recent years: the circumstances under which a police officer may administer a warrantless blood alcohol concentration (BAC) test to a motorist who appears to have been driving under the influence of alcohol.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The Secretary of Commerce decided to reinstate a question about citizenship on the 2020 census questionnaire.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Voters and other plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland filed suits challenging their States’ congressional districting maps as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Respondent Andre Haymond was convicted of possessing child pornography, a crime that carries a prison term of zero to 10 years.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Petitioner James Kisor, a Vietnam War veteran, first sought disability benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in 1982, alleging that he had developed post-traumatic stress disorder from his military service.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The State of Tennessee imposes demanding durational residency requirements on all individuals and businesses seeking to obtain or renew a license to operate a liquor store.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

In our constitutional order, a vague law is no law at all. Only the people’s elected representatives in Congress have the power to write new federal criminal laws.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Congress has instructed that the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act do “not apply” to “confidential” private-sector “commercial or financial information” in the government’s possession.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Two Terms ago, in Matal v. Tam, 582 U. S. ___ (2017), this Court invalidated the Lanham Act’s bar on the registration of “disparag[ing]” trademarks. 15 U. S. C. §1052(a).

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

By granting federal courts jurisdiction over maritime and admiralty cases, the Constitution implicitly directs federal courts sitting in admiralty to proceed “in the manner of a common law court.”

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (1986), this Court ruled that a State may not discriminate on the basis of race when exercising peremptory challenges against prospective jurors in a criminal trial.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case is about the limits of a State’s power to tax a trust.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

A federal statute, 18 U. S. C. §922(g), provides that “[i]t shall be unlawful” for certain individuals to possess firearms.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment states that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The nondelegation doctrine bars Congress from transferring its legislative power to another branch of Government.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Petitioner Edward McDonough alleges that respondent Youel Smith fabricated evidence and used it to pursue criminal charges against him.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Since 1925, the Bladensburg Peace Cross (Cross) has stood as a tribute to 49 area soldiers who gave their lives in the First World War.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case concerns two federal statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (Telephone Act) and the Administrative Orders Review Act (Hobbs Act).

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

New York state law requires cable operators to set aside channels on their cable systems for public access.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Virginia Uranium, Inc., wants to mine raw uranium ore from a site near Coles Hill, Virginia, but Virginia law flatly prohibits uranium mining in the Commonwealth.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

We consider in this case whether to overrule a longstanding interpretation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The Court resolves in this opinion a question of standing to appeal.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Section 924(e) of Title 18, also known as the Armed Career Criminal Act, mandates a minimum 15-year prison sentence for a felon who unlawfully possesses a firearm and has three prior convictions for a “serious drug offense” or “violent felony.”

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

In the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, 35 U. S. C. §100 et seq., Congress created the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and established three new types of administrative proceedings before the Board that allow a “person” other than the patent owner to challenge the validity of a patent post-issuance.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), 67 Stat. 462, 43 U. S. C. §1331 et seq., extends federal law to the subsoil and seabed of the Outer Continental Shelf and all attachments thereon (OCS).

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

One way or another, Medicare touches the lives of nearly all Americans.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

At the conclusion of a bankruptcy proceeding, a bankruptcy court typically enters an order releasing the debtor from liability for most prebankruptcy debts.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 proscribes discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case requires the Court to decide whether a convicted criminal’s period of supervised release is tolled—in effect, paused—during his pretrial detention for a new criminal offense.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Indiana’s petition for certiorari argues that the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit incorrectly invalidated two new provisions of Indiana law: the first relating to the disposition of fetal remains by abortion providers; and the second barring the knowing provision of sex-, race-, or disability-selective abortions by abortion providers.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest