John Guido and Dennis Rankin filed suit, alleging that the Mount Lemmon Fire District, a political subdivision in Arizona, terminated their employment as firefighters in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA).

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This appeal arises from a remedial redistricting order entered by the District Court in a racial gerrymandering case we have seen before.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a denial of federal habeas relief, 28 U. S. C. §2254, on the ground that the state court had unreasonably rejected respondent’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Petitioner Mary Ann Sause, proceeding pro se, filed this action under Rev. Stat. 1979, 42 U. S. C. §1983, and named as defendants past and present members of the Louisburg, Kansas, police department, as well as the current mayor and a former mayor of the town.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Under Illinois law, public employees are forced to subsidize a union, even if they choose not to join and strongly object to the positions the union takes in collective bargaining and related activities.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case concerns the proper apportionment of the water of an interstate river basin.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act (FACT Act) requires clinics that primarily serve pregnant women to provide certain notices.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States undergo a vetting process to ensure that they satisfy the numerous requirements for admission.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Before us for review are orders of a three-judge court in the Western District of Texas effectively directing the State not to conduct this year’s elections using districting plans that the court itself adopted some years earlier.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company (collectively, Amex) provide credit-card services to both merchants and cardholders.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

About to face trial, Michael Currier worried the prosecution would introduce prejudicial but probative evidence against him on one count that could infect the jury’s deliberations on others.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case is about the legality of a military officer serving as a judge on both an Air Force appeals court and the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR).

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Under the Patent Act, a company can be liable for patent infringement if it ships components of a patented invention overseas to be assembled there.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case presents the question whether the Government conducts a search under the Fourth Amendment when it accesses historical cell phone records that provide a comprehensive chronicle of the user’s past movements.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

As the Great Depression took its toll, struggling railroad pension funds reached the brink of insolvency.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The Appointments Clause of the Constitution lays out the permissible methods of appointing “Officers of the United States,” a class of government officials distinct from mere employees. Art. II, §2, cl. 2.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Nonpermanent residents, like petitioner here, who are subject to removal proceedings and have accrued 10 years of continuous physical presence in the United States, may be eligible for a form of discretionary relief known as cancellation of removal.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

When a consumer purchases goods or services, the consumer’s State often imposes a sales tax.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This appeal arises from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction in the District Court.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) provides that a court of appeals may consider errors that are plain and affect substantial rights, even though they are raised for the first time on appeal.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case concerns a criminal drug offender originally sentenced in accordance with the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case requires the Court to address the intersection of principles that define when arrests are lawful and principles that prohibit the government from retaliating against a person for having exercised the right to free speech.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The State of Wisconsin, like most other States, entrusts to its legislature the periodic task of redrawing the boundaries of the State’s legislative districts.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

When foreign law is relevant to a case instituted in a federal court, and the foreign government whose law is in contention submits an official statement on the meaning and interpretation of its domestic law, may the federal court look beyond that official statement?

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. JUSTICE KENNEDY took no part in the decision of this case.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

A Minnesota law provides that “the dissolution or annulment of a marriage revokes any revocable[] beneficiary designation[] made by an individual to the individual’s former spouse.”

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

It has been estimated that 24 million voter registrations in the United States—about one in eight—are either invalid or significantly inaccurate.

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest

This case concerns the tolling rule first stated in American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah, 414 U. S. 538 (1974).

Tagged with: Civil Digest SCOTUS Digest