Quantcast
Home / News (page 1113) /

News

01-0489-CR State v. Dahl

Thomas Dahl appeals from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Dahl contends that Wis. Stat. sec. 343.305, Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ...

Read More »

01-0183-CR State v. Wakershauser

Neil Wakershauser appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) as a fourth offense. On appeal, he originally challenged the validity of both his second and third prior convictions, claiming that he did ...

Read More »

00-1947 Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, et al.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing the claims against the company in connection with Kreuser’s failure to drive the employee home. However, we affirm the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims against the company based on respondeat ...

Read More »

01-0060-CR State v. Kozlowski

Timothy T. Kozlowski appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug, as a third offense. Kozlowski claims that the trial ...

Read More »

00-2851 State v. Jackowski

Accordingly, the police officers’ subsequent discovery and seizure of illegal firearms was not “fruit of the poisonous tree,” and there was no Fourth Amendment violation. “In summary, we conclude that the issuance of the special inspection warrant authorizing a city ...

Read More »

00-2361-CR State v. Reinhardt

Steven J. Reinhardt appeals from a judgment convicting him of one count of theft by contractor, and three counts of unfair home improvement trade practices. Reinhardt also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal and sentence ...

Read More »

00-2919 Kerry Inc. v. Econo Equipment Inc.

Econo Equipment, Inc. appeals the portion of the circuit court’s order refusing to award attorney’s fees incurred in defending against Kerry, Inc.’s claims. Econo argues that a contract provision allowing it to recover attorney’s fees incurred “in the enforcement and ...

Read More »

99-2948-CR State v. Tate

Gary Tate appeals from a judgment of conviction of repeated sexual assault of the same child, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. In addition to challenging the constitutionality of sec. 948.025 as applied, Tate argues that ...

Read More »

00-3197-CR State v. Cantwell

Brian W. Cantwell appeals from a judgment convicting him of theft, and from an order denying postconviction relief. His original judgment of conviction contained a sentencing provision the trial court subsequently clarified. The issue is whether the clarification actually increased ...

Read More »

00-4169 Pugh v. City of Attica

“Pugh fails to show that the City’s proffered reason for his discharge is unworthy of credence. It is insufficient for Mr. Pugh simply to assert that he did not misappropriate funds and that the City’s belief was mistaken without offering ...

Read More »

01-0287-FT In Re the Marriage of: Camden v. Camden

Jerry Alan and Virginia Camden were divorced after 19 years of marriage. On appeal, Virginia challenges the property division and maintenance award. We affirm the trial court’s property division, but reverse the maintenance award and remand for further proceedings consistent ...

Read More »

00-2813 Winfrey v. City of Chicago

“Winfrey also indicated a desire to occupy the position of dispatcher, and – because he was never given a chance to explore this position – he claims the City failed to engage in good faith in an interactive process designed ...

Read More »

00-1310 In Re the Marriage of: Glunz v. Sokol

Laura A. Sokol appeals from the judgment of divorce entered following divorce proceedings between her and Michael J. Glunz. Sokol challenges two property division rulings of the trial court. First, she claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion ...

Read More »

00-2398 In Re the Marriage of Becvar v. Becvar

In this postdivorce judgment proceeding, Paula Becvar appeals an order denying her motion to move with her children to Minnesota. She claims that the court relied on inappropriate factors and that the children’s father, Charles Becvar, failed to demonstrate that ...

Read More »

00-1208 Roberts v. Wolf, et al.

Tecwyn Roberts, Sara H. Roberts and Elizabeth M. Halkerston (collectively, the Robertses) sued John J. Wolf and Linda Wolf alleging intentional trespass to land, injury to real property, unlawful cutting of timber and interference with or declaration of interest in ...

Read More »

00-2944 U.S. v. Schaffner

“The photograph at issue in this case actually traveled across state lines. As in Bell, where the movement of a weapon across state lines satisfied the commerce element of the statute, the interstate movement of the photograph provides a sufficient ...

Read More »

00-1513 U.S. v. Green

“In United States v. West, 670 F.2d 675, 687 (7th Cir. 1982), we interpreted Rule 801(d) (1)(B)’s requirement of cross-examination to mean that the out-of-court statement must be elicited through the declarant, and not through a third party to whom ...

Read More »

00-1215 U.S. v. Kosth

“Although Kosth attacks the sufficiency of the evidence of sham ownership, we are satisfied that there was enough evidence in the record to support the jury’s decision to accept the government’s version of events. There was ample evidence to support ...

Read More »

00-2832, 00-2833, 00-2834 State v. Moss

Peter Moss appeals his conviction for possessing fireworks with the intent to unlawfully sell. He also challenges the trial court’s judgment forfeiting his stock of fireworks. Moss contends that the record lacks sufficient evidence for conviction. He also argues that ...

Read More »

00-3569 U.S. v. Manjarrez

“[T]he ostrich instruction itself made it clear that a defendant does not act ‘knowingly’ when he acts through ‘ignorance, mistake, or accident,’ or where ‘he was merely negligent in not discovering the truth.’ This alone might well obviate any need ...

Read More »

00-0628 State v. Schultz

Joseph Schultz appeals a judgment declaring his bar a nuisance. He also appeals an order of abatement enjoining him from operating the bar. Schultz argues that: (1) he was denied actual notice of the conduct upon which the judgment was ...

Read More »

00-2948-CR State v. Headrick

Timothy Headrick appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery. He argues that the trial court should have suppressed his confession because it was involuntary and it was given after he invoked his right to counsel. We reject these arguments ...

Read More »