Quantcast
Home / News (page 1114) /

News

01-2591 Dahler v. U.S.

“This distinction between challenges to events that are novel to the resentencing (and will be treated as initial collateral attacks) and events that predated the resentencing (and will be treated as successive collateral attacks) has been adopted by every other ...

Read More »

00-2650-CR State v. Novak

Timothy Novak appeals a set of judgments convicting him of one count of being party to the crime of arson, two counts of insurance fraud, and one count of false swearing, and also appeals an order denying his motion for ...

Read More »

00-3537 U.S. v. Williams

“Application Note 2 to sec. 3A1.1 (b)(1) … defines ‘vulnerable victim’ for purposes of the guidelines as a person (A) who is a victim of the offense of conviction and any conduct for which the defendant is accountable under sec. ...

Read More »

00-2800-CR State v. Gipson

The State appeals from a pretrial order suppressing the statements given to a police officer in a postpolygraph interview. The trial court ruled that the statements given by Anthony L. Gipson in the interview were so closely related to the ...

Read More »

00-3174 State v. Quinn

Eddie Lee Quinn appeals from an order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to establish that he is entitled to postconviction relief. Although Quinn concedes that he failed to raise on appeal the issues he is currently asserting, as ...

Read More »

01-0206-CR State v. Polk

Johnny D. Polk appeals from a judgment entered on no contest pleas to two counts of battery as a habitual criminal. Polk also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Polk claims: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel ...

Read More »

00-2699 Rural Mutual Insurance Co. v. Welsh

“Rural argues that specific provisions of an insurance contract control over general provisions, a proposition with which, as a general rule of construction, we have no quarrel. However, we cannot agree that, absent an exclusionary reference over to the supplemental ...

Read More »

01-0489-CR State v. Dahl

Thomas Dahl appeals from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Dahl contends that Wis. Stat. sec. 343.305, Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ...

Read More »

01-0183-CR State v. Wakershauser

Neil Wakershauser appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) as a fourth offense. On appeal, he originally challenged the validity of both his second and third prior convictions, claiming that he did ...

Read More »

00-1947 Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, et al.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing the claims against the company in connection with Kreuser’s failure to drive the employee home. However, we affirm the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims against the company based on respondeat ...

Read More »

01-0060-CR State v. Kozlowski

Timothy T. Kozlowski appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug, as a third offense. Kozlowski claims that the trial ...

Read More »

01-1298 U.S. v. Dowell

“Contrary to the government’s argument, we have repeatedly held that an error in designating the judgment will not result in a loss of appeal if the intent to appeal from the contested judgment may be inferred from the notice and ...

Read More »

00-3423-CR State v. Davis

Stacy Davis appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of recklessly endangering safety, and an order denying postconviction relief. He argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to make an appropriate offer of proof, failed ...

Read More »

00-2982-CR State v. Blackburn

David Blackburn appeals a judgment convicting him of repeatedly sexually assaulting his stepdaughter. He argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support the conviction. We reject that argument and affirm the judgment. This opinion will not be ...

Read More »

00-2389 Matlin v. City of Sheboygan

Accordingly, the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s petition. “The interest of the City and public in preventing harm from dilapidated buildings is adequately served by the initial raze order. This triggers the events which may lead to the repair ...

Read More »

00-2863 State v. Maxon

Chad T. Maxon appeals his trial court conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. He presents three issues: First, he claims that there was not probable cause to stop and arrest him. Second, he ...

Read More »

01-1059 Wallscetti v. Fox, et al.

“Wallscetti … points to an April 10, 1997 entry in Lagges’ confidential file. This entry mostly discusses Lagges’s unwillingness to grant Wallscetti a transfer until she provided him with supporting evidence for her allegations against Fox. The end of the ...

Read More »

00-2143 Pietrowski v. Dufrane

And this is so even though plaintiffs, and others in the subdivision, had also violated the restrictive covenant by erecting sheds on their property. “The Dufranes assert that ‘the distinguishing factor in the present case is that the plaintiff has ...

Read More »

00-3441 State v. Senecal

Michael A. Senecal appeals from an order revoking his driving privileges based upon the trial’s court determination that Senecal improperly refused to submit to a chemical test under the Implied Consent Law, Wis. Stat. sec. 343.305. On appeal, Senecal argues ...

Read More »

00-3827 Johnson v. Nordstrom Inc., et al.

“Johnson takes issue with the district court’s reliance on her alleged interview answer stating that sales would be the primary aspect of the beauty director’s job. Johnson claims that ‘even if she did [give that answer], that was not necessarily ...

Read More »

01-0546-CR State v. Miller

Douglas J. Miller appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (OWPAC). Miller challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the results of a chemical test of his blood. Specifically, Miller ...

Read More »