Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

removal

Nov 21, 2011

Civil Procedure; Class actions; removal

11-8017 LG Display Co., Ltd., v. Madigan

Nov 9, 2011

Immigration — removal

11-1622 Gourche v. Holder

Aug 26, 2011

10-3244 Wani Site v. Holder

Immigration Removal; Sudan

Aug 25, 2011

10-3134 Micrometl Corp. v. Transact Technologies, Inc.

Civil Procedure Removal; attorney fees

Aug 25, 2011

10-3433 Familia Rosario v. Holder

Immigration Removal; aggravated felonies

Jul 25, 2011

10-2479 Pronsivalkulchai v. Holder

Immigration Removal; withholding

Jul 25, 2011

11-C-0643 Diversey v. Maxwell

Civil Procedure Removal; remand

Jul 22, 2011

10-3912 Marin-Garcia v. Holder

Immigration Removal; equal protection

Apr 7, 2011

11-1386 Lemos v. Holder

Immigration Removal; motions to reopen Where an alien did not timely file a motion to reopen a removal order, his petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. “Tapia received the order on November 1. His signature is on the order; so is his thumbprint. Perhaps the Department did not ‘serve’ the order in the […]

Jan 4, 2011

10-8035, 10-8036, 10-8039, 10-8040, 10-8041, 10-8042 & 10-8048 Koral v. Boeing Co.

Civil Procedure Class actions; removal Individual suits cannot be removed to federal court based only on an expectation that the cases will be consolidated into a class action. “The proposal must be to the court in which the suits are pending, but if the plaintiffs’ statement to the state court that we quoted was a […]

Dec 23, 2010

10-1401 Lin v. Holder

Immigration Asylum; removal; credibility determinations An IJ did not err when she made an adverse credibility determination regarding appellant’s claims in an asylum application that the Chinese government had forced his wife’s abortion and sterilization, where there were inconsistencies in his testimony and the DHS submitted evidence that the certificates of those procedures were fal[...]

Nov 22, 2010

09-3065 Champion v. Holder

Immigration Removal; undue hardship It was error to deny a request for cancellation of removal based on undue hardship to the claimant’s children, on the basis that the claimant’s husband could care for them, when the husband also faced removal. “We find that Champion’s allegation that the BIA ignored the evidence she presented concerning Yomi’s […]

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests