Evidence – Other acts – expert testimony – harmless error
2010AP1973-CR State v. Gasper
2010AP1294-CR State v. Evans
Evidence Other acts; expert testimony Joseph Evans appeals from a judgment of conviction for the first-degree intentional homicide of his estranged wife and criminal damage to property. Evans challenges the admissibility of other acts evidence and expert testimony. We reject Evans’ arguments and affirm. Affirmed. This opinion will not be published. 2010AP1294-CR State v. Evans […]
2009AP567-CR State v. Marinez
Evidence Other acts evidence Where other acts evidence was intertwined with admissible evidence, its admission was proper. “We conclude that in light of the greater latitude rule and the fact that the other-acts evidence was so intertwined with the otherwise admissible videotaped statement of the child victim, the circuit court properly determined that each of […]
2009AP3107-CR State v. Meenen
Evidence Other acts Jonathan Meenen appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child. Meenen argues the circuit court erroneously admitted other acts evidence. We disagree and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports. 2009AP3107-CR State v. Meenen Dist III, Outagamie County, McGinnis, J., Hoover, P.J. Attorneys: For Appellant: Hintze, […]
2009AP3167-CR State v. Moore
Evidence Other acts; hearsay; right to present defense Kevin Moore appeals his conviction for intentionally murdering his wife. He makes four separate arguments as to why his conviction should be overturned: 1) there was insufficient evidence to convict him, 2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his spending habits at a gentlemen’s club, […]
2010AP911-CR State v. Cruz
Evidence Other acts Salvador Cruz appeals from a judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct in violation of Wis. Stat. § 947.01. The conviction stems from his conduct toward a Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) case manager. Cruz argues that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence and argument at trial […]
08-3306 U.S. v. Albiola
Evidence Other acts Where a defendant is charged with using a communication facility in the commission of a controlled substance, other mailing labels are admissible to show intent. “The other mailing labels in this case supported the inference that the fictitious address on the subject package was not accidental, and was instead an intentional act […]
Legal News
- (Updated) Wisconsin law enforcement clash with pro-Palestinian Madison protestors
- Gov. Evers seeks applicants for Lafayette County Circuit Court
- Complaint against University filed by Wisconsin law firm over $1.9M given to Palestinian students
- Hush money trial judge raises threat of jail as he finds Trump violated gag order, fines him $9K
- Active shooter ‘neutralized’ outside Wisconsin middle school
- Audit finds Wisconsin Capitol Police emergency response times up, calls for better tracking
- Jury finds Wisconsin man sane in sexual assault, killing of toddler
- Attorney sentenced to 20 years in prison for sexually exploiting numerous children
- UW-Madison pro-Palestine protesters spark debate over free speech laws
- DEA to reclassify marijuana in a historic shift
- Wisconsin opens public comment on constitutional amendment regarding election officials
- Court upholds Milwaukee police officer’s firing for posting racist memes
WLJ People
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Russell Nicolet
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Benjamin Nicolet
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Dustin T. Woehl
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Katherine Metzger
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Joseph Ryan
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – James M. Ryan
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Dana Wachs
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Mark L. Thomsen
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Matthew Lein
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Jeffrey A. Pitman
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – William Pemberton
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Howard S. Sicula