Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Insurance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 8, 2024//

Insurance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 8, 2024//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Zhen Lin

Case No.: 22-2776

Officials: Easterbrook, Wood, and Pryor, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Insurance

Zhen Feng Lin, a food delivery driver, sustained severe injuries in a car accident. Following the accident, Lin received compensation from the insurance of the at-fault driver and workers’ compensation benefits from Hartford Fire Insurance Company, his employer’s insurer. Lin subsequently pursued additional recovery under his employer’s underinsured motorist policy with Hartford Accident.

The Seventh Circuit upheld the district court’s ruling that Lin and Hartford Accident had not reached a “settlement agreement” as outlined in the insurance policy. Consequently, the court decided that the policy’s limits should be reduced by the amount Lin received in workers’ compensation benefits. Furthermore, the court concurred with the district court’s determination that Lin should be reimbursed for the sum he paid to resolve the workers’ compensation lien.

Moreover, the court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Lin’s counterclaims alleging bad faith and breach of contract. It found no credible basis supporting the assertion that Hartford Accident unreasonably delayed settling Lin’s claim. Lin’s request for statutory penalties due to Hartford Accident’s alleged delay in processing his claim was also rejected.

Lastly, the court declined to grant sanctions against either party. While Lin’s appeal was deemed partly frivolous, the court chose not to impose sanctions at its discretion.

Affirmed.

Decided 04/01/24

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests