Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Listen to this article

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Monta Anderson v. United States of America

Case No.: 22-2666

Officials: Flaum, Rovner, and St. Eve, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Anderson, the petitioner, sought to overturn his guilty plea for conspiring to distribute heroin, alleging that his plea was not made knowingly and voluntarily due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Anderson claimed that his legal counsel advised him to plead guilty without first consulting a toxicology expert to determine if the heroin he distributed was a direct cause of a user’s death. Previously, the court had sent the case back for an evidentiary hearing, determining that Anderson had raised a credible claim of attorney ineffectiveness.

During the subsequent hearing, Anderson presented evidence suggesting that consulting a toxicology expert would have revealed the government’s inability to definitively prove that the heroin he supplied caused the user’s death. However, the government contended that even without the enhancement for death results, Anderson would have still faced a mandatory life sentence due to his prior felony drug convictions and the severe injuries suffered by two individuals from overdosing on heroin provided by Anderson.

After weighing the evidence and arguments, the court concluded that Anderson was not adversely affected by any alleged inadequacy of his legal representation. Even if the enhancement for death results was disregarded, Anderson would have still been subject to a mandatory life sentence due to his previous felony drug conviction and the significant injuries caused by his heroin distribution. Therefore, his decision to plead guilty and accept a 20-year sentence was deemed reasonable.

Affirmed.

Decided 02/26/24

Full Text