By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 3, 2015//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Sentencing — accurate information — new factors
Jose S. Soto, Sr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Soto argues: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel at the sentencing hearing; (2) that his due process right to be sentenced based on accurate information was violated; and (3) his 1982 diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia is a new factor warranting sentence modification. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2013AP1742-CR State v. Soto
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Konkol, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Soto, Jose S., Sr., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Moeller, Marguerite M., Madison