Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Public Health – Disability benefits

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 8, 2015

Public Health – Disability benefits

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 8, 2015

U.S. Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Public Health – Disability benefits

Where the ALJ did not explain why it rejected the treating physician’s conclusions, the denial of disability benefits must be reversed.

“The ALJ has a duty to fully develop the record before drawing any conclusions and must adequately articulate her analysis so that we can follow her reasoning. Murphy, 496 F.3d at 634. Without explaining how or why Dr. Kachmann’s bending and twisting opinion was not supported by the record, we are unable to properly review the ALJ’s opinion determination.

Similarly, the ALJ did not adequately articulate why Dr. Kachmann’s statements were internally inconsistent. In light of these errors, the ALJ must reevaluate whether Dr. Kachmann’s findings are entitled to controlling weight.”

Reversed and Remanded.

13-3626 Minnick v. Colvin

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Van Bokkelen, J., Bauer, J.

Full Text

 

Polls

Should Justice Protasiewicz recuse herself on gerrymandering cases that go before the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests