Family — protective placement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 5, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Family — protective placement

Carl T., the guardian of Gerhardt T.’s person, appeals a protective placement order that determined the least restrictive placement consistent with Gerhardt’s needs was the residence of Gerhardt’s spouse, Susan L. Carl argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion because the court’s placement subjects Gerhardt to potential neglect and financial exploitation. This court concludes the circuit court’s placement determination is supported by the record. Accordingly, the circuit court’s order is affirmed. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP2110 In the matter of the guardianship and protective placement of Gerhardt T.

Dist III, Langlade County, Kawalski, J., Cane, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hogan, John J., Rhinelander; For Respondent: Cirilli, Scott A., Rhinelander

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event