Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — double jeopardy – mistrials — manifest necessity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 2, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — double jeopardy – mistrials — manifest necessity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 2, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — double jeopardy – mistrials — manifest necessity

Kamel Khatib appeals an order denying his motion to dismiss following a mistrial. Khatib argues there was no manifest necessity requiring a mistrial and, therefore, the charges must be dismissed on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP22-CR State v. Khatib

Dist III, Outagamie County, Des Jardins, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Carroll, John M., Appleton; For Respondent: Borsheim, Curtis A., Appleton; For Respondent: Wren, Christopher G., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests