By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 29, 2012//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Civil
Contracts — unjust enrichment
Good to Go Quick Mart, Inc., appeals from a judgment and an order granting summary judgment in favor of Daniel K. Anderson, Ltd.
Certified Public Accountants (DKA) on DKA’s claim for unjust enrichment. Good to Go contends the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment because material facts remain in dispute or, in the alternative, it should be allowed to raise the defense that it is an innocent transferee for value. We conclude the court reasonably applied the theory of unjust enrichment and properly exercised its discretion in allowing recovery to DKA. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Waukesha County, Hassin, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Colque, Erik Inti, Waukesha; For Respondent: Fiedler, Noah D., Milwaukee