Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Contracts — unjust enrichment

WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 29, 2012//

Contracts — unjust enrichment

WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 29, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Contracts —

Good to Go Quick Mart, Inc., appeals from a judgment and an order granting summary judgment in favor of Daniel K. Anderson, Ltd.

Certified Public Accountants (DKA) on DKA’s claim for unjust enrichment. Good to Go contends the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment because material facts remain in dispute or, in the alternative, it should be allowed to raise the defense that it is an innocent transferee for value. We conclude the court reasonably applied the theory of unjust enrichment and properly exercised its discretion in allowing recovery to DKA. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2154 Daniel K. Anderson Ltd. Certified Public Accountants v. Good to Go Quick Mart Inc., et al.

Dist II, Waukesha County, Hassin, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Colque, Erik Inti, Waukesha; For Respondent: Fiedler, Noah D., Milwaukee

Polls

Has AI improved your efficiency at work?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Legal Tech Directory

Wisconsin Law Journal connects 640K legal professionals with leading technology and service providers nationwide.

Descrybe

Wed Jun 3, 2026

Text Timeline

Mon Jul 13, 2026

TEAL IP

Wed Jun 24, 2026

Disclosure Assistant

Tue Jun 16, 2026

Opinion Digests