Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 15, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 15, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Garland H. Hampton, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing based on a new factor. The circuit court denied the motion, concluding that there was no new factor and that the motion was procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). We agree and affirm. This opinion shall not be published.

2011AP1393-CR State v. Hampton

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hampton, Garland H., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Banse, Crystal A., Madison

Polls

Should additional funding and resources be given to the Secret Service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests