Sexual Assault — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 1, 2012//

Listen to this article

Thaying Lor appeals the judgment convicting him of five counts of sexual assault and one count of attempted sexual assault. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Lor argues that he ought to be granted a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective, and because the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the first count of sexual assault. In the alternative, Lor argues that he should be resentenced because his sentence was overly harsh. We reject Lor’s arguments and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2011AP2019-CR State v. Lor

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Martens, J., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Gallagher, Benjamin F., St. Paul, Minn.; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Probst, Robert, Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event