Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — speedy trial — Confrontation Clause — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 22, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — speedy trial — Confrontation Clause — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 22, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — speedy trial — Confrontation Clause — ineffective assistance

Anthony Jacobson appeals two judgments convicting him of multiple offenses and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jacobson argues: (1) he was denied his right to a speedy trial; (2) the circuit court erroneously excluded certain evidence; (3) the exclusion of the evidence violated Jacobson’s right to confront witnesses; and (4) his trial attorney was ineffective. He also seeks a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject Jacobson’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP38-CR, 2011AP39-CR State v. Jacobson

Dist III, Chippewa County, Cameron, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Phillips, Steven D., Madison; For Respondent: Newell, Wade C., Chippewa Falls; Burgundy, Sarah, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests