Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 28, 2011//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 28, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Jamar Redmond appeals from that portion of a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, reflecting his conviction on one count of repeated sexual assault of the same child. Redmond also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief without a hearing. Redmond claimed that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel when counsel failed to make proper objections to, or otherwise seek to limit, evidence that Redmond pulled out a knife when police arrived to arrest him for the sexual assault. We agree with the circuit court that trial counsel was not ineffective, so we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP539-CR State v. Redmond

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Cheesman, Benbow P., Jr., West Allis; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Dietrich, Thomas E., Madison

Polls

Should additional funding and resources be given to the Secret Service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests