Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 9, 2011//

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 9, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence — ineffective assistance

Oscar Thomas appeals from judgments convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree sexual assault and false imprisonment arising out of the death of his former wife and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. On appeal, Thomas argues the circuit court should have suppressed his first statement to police because it was involuntary and given without Miranda warnings. He also argues that his trial counsel was ineffective and that he presented newly discovered evidence postconviction. We reject these claims and affirm the judgments and the order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1606-CR State v. Thomas

Dist II, Kenosha County, Schroeder, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Bonneson, Paul G., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Zapf, Robert D., Kenosha; Freimuth, James M., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests