Sentencing — relevant factors

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 1, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — relevant factors

Scott Kappus appeals a judgment of conviction for three counts of possessing child pornography and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Kappus argues the circuit court considered an irrelevant and immaterial factor when determining his sentence. We disagree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP217-CR State v. Kappus

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Proctor, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Chapman, Dan, Hudson; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; White, Glenn R., Eau Claire

Related Content

Weekly Case Digests

Weekly Case Digests – March 21, 2022 - March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

Termination of Parental Rights

Jessica appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (TPR) to her daughter, and an order denying her [...]

March 24, 2022

Abuse of Discretion – Evidentiary Hearing

Willie Allison appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of three counts of human t[...]

March 24, 2022

Court Error – Postconviction Motion Denied

Robert C. Stryker, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child and an [...]

March 24, 2022

Divorce – Child Placement Order

Julie C. Valadez appeals from a judgment of divorce terminating her marriage to her former husband, Ricardo Va[...]

March 24, 2022

Sentence Credit

Tanya M. Liedke appeals from an order denying her motion for correction of sentence credit.

March 24, 2022

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event