Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 6, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Eric Hainstock appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide and an order denying his postconviction motions. He contends that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard to his pretrial suppression motion; and that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to raise an additional ground for suppression, failing to seek a change of venue, and failing to challenge a juror at voir dire. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP2905-CR State v. Hainstock

Dist IV, Sauk County, Taggert, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Petit, Gregory A., Menasha; For Respondent: Wren, Christopher G., Madison; Barrett, Patricia A., Baraboo

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event