Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 4, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Kareem Q. Curry, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to set aside his conviction based on newly discovered evidence. The circuit court rejected the notion that Curry’s newly discovered evidence was newly discovered, and concluded that his motion was procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). We agree with the circuit court and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP193 State v. Curry

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Curry, Kareem Q., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Losse, Michael J., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event