Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP1003 In re the marriage of: Black v. Black

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 7, 2011//

2010AP1003 In re the marriage of: Black v. Black

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 7, 2011//

Listen to this article

Family
Marital estate; inherited property; dissipation

Sung Ja Black appeals from the property division component of her divorce judgment. She claims that the circuit court should have: (1) subjected the inherited property of her husband Richard Black to division in order to avoid hardship for Sung Ja; (2) included in the marital estate funds that Sung Ja alleged Richard had hidden or dissipated; and (3) deviated from the presumption of an equal property division to avoid hardship for Sung Ja. For the reasons discussed below, we reject each of Sung Ja’s claims and affirm the divorce judgment in its entirety. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1003 In re the marriage of: Black v. Black

Dist IV, Dane County, Smith, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Arellano, Victor, Middleton; For Respondent: Abbott, William A., Madison; Stohr, Kelly Jean, Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests