Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP801 Caledonia Direct Inc. v. Fakler, et al.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 10, 2011//

2010AP801 Caledonia Direct Inc. v. Fakler, et al.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 10, 2011//

Listen to this article

Employment
Covenants not to compete

Caledonia Direct, Inc. (CDI) appeals the trial court’s order granting Jeffrey Fakler and AIM Transfer & Storage, Inc.’s motion to dismiss CDI’s claim that Fakler, a former CDI employee, breached the covenant not to compete that he signed on Dece. 2, 2008. CDI contends that the trial court erred in its determination that the covenant not to compete was unenforceable because it was ambiguous. We agree with CDI. When a covenant not to compete is found to be ambiguous, it is the trial court’s obligation to look for extrinsic evidence to discern its meaning. Because the trial court did not do so in this case, we reverse and remand this matter to the trial court. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2010AP801 Caledonia Direct Inc. v. Fakler, et al.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cooper, J., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Vanderloop, Jeremy, Mayville; For Respondent: Rumbaugh, Eric H., Milwaukee; Thomure, John C., Jr., Milwaukee

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests