By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 3, 2011//
Criminal Procedure
Successive appeals
A’Kim Mack, a/k/a Kelvin Mack, pro se, appeals from an order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) motion. To avoid the procedural bar of State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), Mack submits that he received information that his trial attorney had a conflict of interest and that this information constitutes newly discovered evidence. We reject Mack’s argument and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.
2010AP1277 State v. Mack
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cimpl, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Mack, A’Kim, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; O’Neil, Aaron R., Madison