Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / 2009AP3088 River Valley Bank vs. Corsten, et al.

2009AP3088 River Valley Bank vs. Corsten, et al.

Property
Foreclosure

Sean Corsten appeals an order vacating an order confirming a sheriff’s sale and voiding the sheriff’s deed. Although the issues he raises on appeal are not adequately developed, he contends that the doctrines of invited error and claim preclusion should be applied. Because we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP3088 River Valley Bank vs. Corsten, et al.

Dist III, Lincoln County, Kinney, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Corsten, Sean T., pro se; For Respondent: Cravens, John A., Wausau; Anderson, Mary Susan, Wausau

Full Text


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*