By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 2, 2011//
Criminal Procedure
Plea withdrawal
Matrice Robinson appeals from a judgment of conviction for unauthorized use of an individual’s personal indentifying information or documents, Wis. Stat. § 943.201(2) (2009-10), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Robinson argues that the plea colloquy the circuit court conducted with him was defective and he should be allowed to withdraw his plea. We conclude that even if the plea colloquy may not have been adequate, the state established at an evidentiary hearing that Robinson entered his plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Consequently, Robinson is not entitled to withdraw his plea and we affirm the judgment and order of the circuit court. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP884-CR State v. Robinson
Dist II, Racine County, Flancher, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Zellner, Kiley, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Gansner, William L., Madison; Nieskes, Michael E., Racine