Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 2010AP1798-CR State v. Strong

2010AP1798-CR State v. Strong

Improvised Explosive Devices Sufficiency of the evidence A device can qualify as an improvised explosive device, even if it is flammable rather than explosive, and the detonator does not work. “While Wis. Stat. § 943.05 distinguishes between combustible and explosive materials, we do not agree that the two terms are always mutually exclusive. By distinguishing between combustible and ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*