Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP2572 Bergstrom v. Polk County

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 11, 2011//

2009AP2572 Bergstrom v. Polk County

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 11, 2011//

Listen to this article

Civil Procedure
Service of process

Where a property owner seeks certiorari review of a county’s issuance of a reclamation permit, but did not serve the county as prescribed in 801.11(4)(a)1, the circuit court lacks jurisdiction.

“In an action against a county, Wis. Stat. ch. 801 requires personal service upon the county board chairperson or county clerk. Wis. Stat. § 801.11(4)(a)1. In an action against a corporation, it requires personal service on the corporation’s officer, director, or managing agent. Wis. Stat. § 801.11(5)(a). Chapter 801 explicitly applies to a certiorari action initiated by the filing of a summons and complaint. Bergstrom has not cited any authority for the proposition that special circumstances can establish personal jurisdiction in a case where service is governed by ch. 801. Thus, we conclude the special circumstances exception does not apply in the context of a certiorari action commenced by the filing of a summons and complaint.”

Reversed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

2009AP2572 Bergstrom v. Polk County

Dist. III, Polk County, Rasmussen, J., Peterson, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Malone, Malia Theresa, Balsam Lake; Arntsen, Allen A., Madison; Heffernan, Michael S., Madison; For Respondent: Ihrig, Richard M., Minneapolis, MN

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests