2010AP29-CR State v. Gallentine

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 14, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance

Bradley Gallentine appeals a judgment of conviction for repeated sexual assault of a child, and an order denying his postconviction motion. Gallentine argues his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to introduce testimony from his employer limiting the time frame in which Gallentine had the opportunity to commit the assaults. Gallentine also argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting hearsay testimony. We reject Gallentine’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP29-CR State v. Gallentine

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Schumacher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Sommers, Joseph L., Oregon; For Respondent: White, Glenn R., Eau Claire; Whelan, Maura F.J., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event