2009AP3195-CR State v. Wal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 19, 2010//

Listen to this article

Sentencing
Reconfinement

Jeremy D. Wall appeals from a reconfinement order entered after the revocation of his extended supervision and from a postconviction order denying his motion seeking a new reconfinement hearing. The issues are whether the circuit court adequately explained its reasons for imposing the reconfinement period that it did, and whether it explained how that period was the minimum amount of custody necessary to achieve the reconfinement considerations. We conclude that the circuit court considered the relevant factors and adequately explained why the maximum reconfinement period was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP3195-CR State v. Wal

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Swartz, Melinda A., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Weber, Gregory M., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event