Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / /page 3

Tag Archives: Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Love of law keeps Dykman involved

Some lawyers read Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (N.Y.1928) in Torts on the first day of law school, but don’t give it much thought for the rest of their careers. Then, there’s Judge Charles P. Dykman.

Read More »

Leaders in the Law 2011: Celebrating our legal professionals

More than 350 judges, lawyers, family and friends attended the Wisconsin Law Journal’s ninth annual Leaders in the Law Event in Milwaukee Wednesday. The evening event, held at the Hilton Milwaukee City Center, recognized 27 attorneys and judges for their contributions to the legal profession. Four leaders – Bruce C. Davidson, Hon. Charles P. Dykman, Robert L. Habush and Joseph ...

Read More »

Asset purchase didn’t include liability

An asset purchase limited to one division of the seller doesn't include liabilities stemming from products made before the division became an entity separate from the rests of the seller's business.

Read More »

Attorneys question sanctions

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals is cracking down on attorneys who improperly certify the completeness of their brief appendices, and legal professionals want to know why.

Read More »

Admission of letter was harmless error

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals on Dec. 29 affirmed the conviction of Mark D. Jensen for murdering his wife Julie in 1998, even though it assumed that admission of a letter written by Julie before her death violated the Confrontation Clause.

Read More »

Officers did not constructively enter home

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals on Nov. 24 recognized that police could violate the Fourth Amendment by "constructive entry" of a home -- being so intrusive that a reasonable person would not feel free to deny entry.

Read More »

Probation can’t be reduced

Successful rehabilitation is not a permissible basis for reducing the length of probation. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals on Oct. 21 would not go so far as holding that a sentencing court never has inherent authority to reduce the length of probation. But it concluded, “courts have no inherent authority to reduce probation based on a finding of successful rehabilitation.” ...

Read More »

No harm, no foul under FDCPA

A Mayville law firm was properly granted summary judgment on a debtor's claim that it violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), even if it did so, because the debtor suffered no damages.

Read More »