Free Newsletter
Prediction market warning sparks legal dispute
Wisconsin election officials warn betting on elections could cost voters their rights as Kalshi and Polymarket challenge the state's legal interpretation.
Elections commission warns betting could cost Wisconsin voters
The Wisconsin Elections Commission warns voters that betting on election outcomes via prediction markets like Kalshi may violate state law and carry felony penalties.
Judge allows Ho-Chunk gambling lawsuit to proceed
A federal judge allowed the Ho-Chunk Nation’s lawsuit against Kalshi to continue over online sports gambling in Wisconsin.
Feds sue Wisconsin over prediction market lawsuits
The CFTC is suing Wisconsin officials to block state lawsuits against Kalshi, Coinbase and Polymarket over alleged illegal gambling schemes.
Wisconsin sues prediction markets over illegal gambling
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul sues Kalshi, Coinbase and others, alleging illegal gambling through sports event contracts.
Ho-Chunk Nation sues Kalshi over illegal sports betting
The Ho-Chunk Nation filed a lawsuit against Kalshi, alleging the platform runs illegal sports betting in violation of tribal, state and federal laws.
Polls
Loading ...Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Legal News
- State Democrats challenge absentee ballot rule
- Prediction market warning sparks legal dispute
- Leadership key to successful AI adoption in the workplace
- Third defendant in Marshfield ATM ‘jackpotting’ theft gets probation
- Elections commission warns betting could cost Wisconsin voters
- State warns of workers’ compensation scam targeting victims
- Milwaukee defends ICE mask ban against DOJ challenge
Case Digests
- Informed Consent-Statutory Standing
- Zoning and Property Rights-Rental Restrictions
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel-Evidence Omission
- Plain Error-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Revocation Sentencing -Sentencing Factors
- Tax Claim Classification-Tax Sale Claims
- Race Discrimination-Employment Retaliation
- First Amendment-Pickering Balancing Test
- Procedural Reasonableness-Federal Sentencing Discretion
- Federal Officer Removal Statute-Climate Change Litigation
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act-Class Action
- Age Discrimination Employment Act-Sufficiency of Evidence
