Free Newsletter
Mar 11, 2025
High court shuns truth in advertising
Permit me to fantasize for a moment. Fifteen years ago, our Supreme Court had an opportunity to rule that “truth in advertising” applied to Supreme Court elections. It failed to do so. It also failed to rule to the contrary. Instead, the court tied 3-3, and in Wisconsin our rules do not allow a tie-breaker.
Polls
Loading ...Legal News
- Judge halts tree clearing at Potawatomi State Park
- Former funeral home owner indicted in Medicaid fraud
- Enbridge settles Wisconsin pipeline spill for $275K
- Supreme Court backs end of protections for Haitians, Syrians
- Wisconsin court upholds Menominee tribal immunity
- Milwaukee prenatal care owner to plead in Medicaid fraud
- Oracle sues PSC over Wisconsin data center rules
- Worker files NLRB charges over union dues dispute
- Canadian gets prison in $1.2M mail fraud scheme
- Eau Claire firm to pay $325K in state pollution settlements
- Illinois man sentenced in Marshfield ATM theft scheme
- Wisconsin officials push to destroy 2020 absentee ballots
Case Digests
- Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- Sufficiency of Evidence-Plain Error
- 6th Amendment-Failure to Prosecute
- Relief from Judgment-Attorney Withdrawal
- Statute of Limitations-Bail Jumping
- Marital Property Division-Competency
- Standing-Marsy’s Law
- Good Faith Covenant-Banking Fees
- Voluntary Consent-Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test
- Class Action Fairness Act-Subject Matter Jurisdiction
- Policy Exclusions-Commercial Crime Bond
- Negligent Misrepresentation-Tortious Interference
