Supreme Court campaign spending sparks reform push
Wisconsin Supreme Court races hit record spending as lawmakers revive public financing and debate recusal rules to address influence, bias and judicial integrity.
Here’s why Supreme Court races draw ‘obscene’ spending
Wisconsin Supreme Court races hit unprecedented $144.5 million as partisan donors, dark money and out-of-state contributions transform the state’s judicial elections.
SCOTUS case may upend campaign finance limits
The Supreme Court may lift limits on coordinated campaign spending, a move that could reshape political races in Wisconsin and across the U.S.
Legal News
- Trial begins for ex-Waupun nurse in inmate death case
- Neenah Foundry to pay $200K in air permit settlement
- Milwaukee attorney convicted in assault case
- FBI probes Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election
- Judge pauses Milwaukee food truck curfew
- Racine County sued over youth detention center beating
- Food truck curfew draws lawsuit
- Milwaukee landlord pleads not guilty in drug case
- WILL challenges Wisconsin signature-gathering ban
- Madison voters sue over rejected absentee ballots
- Former Judge Hannah Dugan renews bid to overturn verdict
- Sheboygan Falls mom stays in ICE custody
Case Digests
- Attorney License Revocation-Sexual Harassment
- Extrinsic Evidence Rule-Corporate Officer Liability
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Medicaid Fair Hearing-Notice and Hearing Rights
- Termination of Parental Rights-Substantial Relationship Test
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act-Plain Error Review
- Jurisdictional Authority-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Fourth Amendment-Evidence Suppression
- Rehabilitation Act-Hostile Workplace
- Federal Arbitration Act-Refusal to Arbitrate
- Breach of Agreement-Mootness-Tax Assessment
- Domestic Abuse-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (Subsequent Counsel)-Intimidation




