Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Madison challenges elections panel over ballot rules

AP Photo/Wong Maye-E, File

Madison challenges elections panel over ballot rules

Listen to this article

IN BRIEF

  • Madison questions commission’s authority to impose new .
  • Dispute follows 193 left uncounted in 2024.
  • City attorney warns changes could disrupt absentee ballot processing.

The City of Madison is questioning whether the Elections Commission can force it to take additional steps to ensure absentee ballots are properly counted without requiring other Wisconsin communities to do the same.

City Attorney , who’s also serving as clerk, sent a letter to the commission pushing back on the requirements that the group plans to vote on this Friday. Besides questions about the commission’s authority, Haas wrote the proposals don’t take into account the steps the city has taken since it failed to count 193 absentee ballots cast in the November 2024 election.

In the letter, Haas asked the commission to seek an opinion from the attorney general or the Legislature’s attorney on whether it has the power to impose the steps that are scheduled to come before the panel on Friday.

“When the Commission is presented with an error that can be corrected in real time, such as a decision whether to certify nomination papers or to order a recall election, the Commission is well within its authority to order local officials to take immediate action to conform their conduct to the law,” Haas wrote. “But regardless of whether there is still an opportunity to fix the error (and here there is not), the Commission’s authority does not extend to requiring the future implementation of specific procedures in excess of those required in the statutes.”

In July, the Elections Commission voted 5-1 to affirm a report finding the former Madison clerk who failed to count 193 absentee ballots broke five . But it stopped short of adopting proposed orders requiring the city clerk’s office to take corrective actions, putting that off until a meeting scheduled for this Friday.

One corrective order, for example, would direct the city to print no later than the Thursday before the election. The commission’s review found Madison failed to prepare the poll books in a way that would’ve helped reveal the 193 absentee ballots that had been returned.

Haas argued that waiting until the Thursday before the election could create challenges for the city. He said for the spring election, Madison placed its printing order on a Tuesday, receiving its poll books back on a Friday. Moving up the day by two additional days would leave less time to mark late-arriving absentee ballots in the books so poll workers knew who already cast their absentee ballots.

Haas argued if the commission wants to dictate local operations “at such a granular level,” it should be done through state law or the administrative rules process after hearing input from local officials.

Polls

Has AI improved your efficiency at work?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests