Attorney’s Fees

Listen to this article

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Christian Arnold v. Martin J. O’Malley

Case No.: 23-1305

Officials: Sykes, Chief Judge, and Brennan, and Lee, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Attorney’s Fees

The is a disagreement over attorney’s fees in a Social Security disability benefits matter. Christian Arnold, the plaintiff, was represented by Binder & Binder, a law firm. Following a determination that Arnold was disabled and entitled to past-due benefits, Binder & Binder sought attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), pursuant to a contingency fee agreement signed by Arnold. However, the district court substantially reduced the requested fees, citing concerns that full payment would provide the law firm with an excessive windfall, which is prohibited by law. Binder & Binder appealed this decision.

Initially, an administrative law judge (ALJ) had found Arnold not disabled. Arnold contested this decision in district court, leading to a remand back to the ALJ. Upon reconsideration, the ALJ ruled in Arnold’s favor, resulting in the Social Security Administration issuing a Notice of Award for past-due benefits. Binder & Binder subsequently filed for attorney’s fees in district court under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) based on their contingency fee agreement with Arnold. However, the district court opted to reduce the requested fees.

The Seventh Circuit determined that the district court had abused its discretion by not primarily evaluating the fee request in light of the contingency agreement before assessing its reasonableness. The Court of Appeals overturned the district court’s decision and sent the case back for further proceedings consistent with its ruling. The court underscored that the contingency fee agreement should serve as the initial basis for determining reasonableness under § 406(b). Any reduction should be justified by considering factors such as the client’s satisfaction with their lawyer’s services, the lawyer’s expertise and effort invested, and the uncertainties and risks associated with the case’s outcome.

Vacated and Remanded.

Decided 07/21/24

Full Text