Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Unpaid Rent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 29, 2024//

Unpaid Rent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 29, 2024//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: WEC 98C-3 LLC v. SFA Holdings Inc.

Case No.: 23-1489

Officials: Wood, Kirsch, and Jackson-Akiwumi, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Unpaid Rent

This case revolves around a disagreement concerning unpaid rent for a department store located within an Illinois mall. CPS Partnership operated the store, leasing the retail space from WEC 98C-3 LLC. Saks Inc. provided a guarantee to pay the rent if CPS defaulted. However, when CPS ceased rent payments, Saks did not fulfill its obligation to WEC. Consequently, WEC defaulted on its mortgage, leading to the property’s acquisition by 4 Stratford Square Mall Holdings, LLC (“Stratford”) through a foreclosure auction. Initially, WEC sued Saks for damages, but later, Stratford intervened with its own claim. The district court exclusively addressed Stratford’s claim for unpaid rent, ruling in favor of Stratford and ordering payment from Saks.

On appeal, Saks contended that Stratford lacked standing to sue, questioned the district court’s judgment certification for immediate appeal, and disputed the rejection of its affirmative defenses by the district court. The appellate court determined that Stratford possessed the requisite standing to sue Saks and upheld the district court’s certification of its judgment for appeal. Regarding the merits, the appellate court concluded that Saks waived its right to assert affirmative defenses to liability in the guaranty it signed. Consequently, Saks was unable to raise its desired defenses, leading the appellate court to affirm the district court’s judgment.

Affirmed.

Decided 04/24/24

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests