Medicaid Act

Listen to this article

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Saint Anthony Hospital v. Elizabeth M. Whitehorn

Case No.: 21-2325

Officials: Wood, Hamilton, and Brennan, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Medicaid Act

The background of the case centers around Saint Anthony Hospital’s financial struggles, attributed to delayed and reduced payments by MCOs, which manage Medicaid benefits under Illinois’ shifted system from a fee-for-service model to managed care. The hospital argued that Illinois officials had a duty to ensure that MCOs made timely and full payments.

The appellate court held that the district court erred in dismissing the hospital’s complaint for failing to state a claim. The appeals court’s decision heavily relied on the Supreme Court’s guidance in a similar case (Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski), which clarified the use of § 1983 to enforce rights under federal statutes enacted under the Spending Clause, including the Medicaid Act.

The appellate court concluded that the Medicaid Act, specifically § 1396u-2(f), provides hospitals with the right to enforce timely payments through state contracts with MCOs. It emphasized that the statute’s language, legislative context, and the structure of Medicaid’s managed care provisions unambiguously conferred enforceable rights to healthcare providers like Saint Anthony.

The ruling underscored that while the state has tools and authority under federal law to address non-compliance by MCOs, it must actively ensure compliance, rather than passively include compliance terms in contracts with MCOs. The court also rejected the state’s argument that the hospital should individually arbitrate each payment dispute with MCOs, recognizing the impracticality given the systemic nature of the alleged payment issues.

The court remanded the case back to the district court for further proceedings, enabling Saint Anthony Hospital to pursue its claims that Illinois failed to adequately oversee MCOs, thus jeopardizing the hospital’s financial health and its ability to serve Medicaid patients. The decision highlights the judiciary’s role in interpreting statutory rights under Medicaid and enforcing state accountability in managing private insurers under the program.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part and remanded

Decided 04/25/24

Full Text