Exclusion of Evidence

Listen to this article

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: United States of America v. Johneak Johnson

Case No.: 23-1264

Officials: Hamilton, Kirsch, and Pryor, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Exclusion of Evidence

Johnson, faced charges for possessing a firearm as a person with a prior felony conviction, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The government contested a pretrial ruling by the District Court, which had excluded evidence related to a laser sight attached to the firearm. The District Court determined that introducing this evidence would unfairly prejudice the defendant, outweighing its probative value. Additionally, the District Court rejected the government’s proposal to limit the laser sight evidence to mitigate the risk of unfair prejudice.

The Court of Appeals asserted that the lower court had inaccurately evaluated the balance between the probative value of the laser sight evidence and the potential for unfair prejudice. The court emphasized that the laser sight evidence played a crucial role in establishing a contentious element of the offense – the possession of the firearm. Furthermore, it noted that the laser sight evidence supported the testimony of the government’s eyewitnesses, a significant factor given the defense’s strategy to challenge their credibility.

Disagreeing with the district court’s assessment of the risk of unfair prejudice, the Court of Appeals held that the government’s proposed limitations on the laser sight evidence were sufficient to minimize any potential perception of the defendant as overly dangerous by the jury. Consequently, the court ruled that the District Court had abused its discretion in excluding the laser sight evidence under Rule 403 and ordered a remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Decided 01/05/24

Full Text