Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Protective Placement-Due Process Rights

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 11, 2023

Protective Placement-Due Process Rights

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 11, 2023

WI Court of Appeals – District III

Case Name: Price County v. C. W.

Case No.: 2023AP000018-FT

Officials: Stark, P.J.

Focus: Protective Placement-Due Process Rights

Clara appeals from an order for her protective placement under WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1). She argues that Price County failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that she was in need of protective placement because it did not present testimony from a medical professional as to each element in § 55.08(1), and that the County’s failure to do so violated her due process rights. We conclude that the relevant statutes do not require a medical professional to provide testimony in support of a petition for protective placement where, as here, a guardianship of Clara’s person was ordered within twelve months of the protective placement hearing, the court took judicial notice of a medical professional’s report and its findings and order from the guardianship proceeding, and a comprehensive evaluation was prepared in this matter pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 55.11 by a qualified individual.

Affirmed.

Decided 09/06/23

Full Text

Polls

Should Justice Protasiewicz recuse herself on gerrymandering cases that go before the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests