Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Habeas Relief – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 14, 2023//

Habeas Relief – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 14, 2023//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Sakajust Scott v. Randall Hepp

Case No.: 22-1314

Officials: Flaum, Rovner, and Brennan, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Habeas Relief – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

After the detectives read Scott his Miranda rights, he admitted in a recorded interview to murder and was convicted. Scott seeks habeas relief, claiming his attorney provided constitutionally deficient representation by failing to move to suppress his confession as obtained in violation of his Miranda rights. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), which governs the review of Scott’s appeal, limits the Seventh Circuit’s ability to grant relief. Since the Wisconsin appellate court’s decision, which upheld Scott’s conviction, was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent.

Affirmed.

Decided 03/09/23

Full Text

Polls

Does your firm utilize AI?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests