Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 30, 2021//

Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 30, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District III

Case Name: Oconto County v. Hayden K. Hawk

Case No.: 2020AP52

Officials: GILL, J.

Focus: Sufficiency of Evidence

Hayden Hawk, pro se, appeals from a civil forfeiture judgment for theft. Hawk contends that: (1) he did not receive proper notice of his trial; (2) the circuit court and the court of appeals erred in declining to appoint an attorney to represent him; (3) his confession was coerced; (4) the circuit court erred in not ordering the victim to preserve or produce surveillance camera footage; (5) his case was pursued only because of his ethnicity; and (6) there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt. We reject Hawk’s arguments and affirm the civil forfeiture judgment.

Full text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests