Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Involuntary Commitment – Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 30, 2021//

Involuntary Commitment – Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//November 30, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District I

Case Name: Milwaukee County v. D.C.B.,

Case No.: 2021AP581

Officials: BRASH, C.J.

Focus: Involuntary Commitment – Sufficiency of Evidence

D.C.B. appeals an order of the trial court extending his involuntary civil commitment, pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 51, by twelve months. D.C.B. argues that Milwaukee County failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove D.C.B.’s dangerousness as required under WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1).

Although not discussed by either party, we reviewed the requirement for recommitment hearings set forth by our supreme court in Langlade County v. D.J.W., 2020 WI 41, 391 Wis. 2d 231, 942 N.W.2d 277; specifically, that the trial court must “make specific factual findings with reference to the subdivision paragraph of WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2. on which the recommitment is based.” D.J.W., 391 Wis. 2d 231, ¶3. D.J.W. was released on April 24, 2020—more than four months before the recommitment hearing in this case was held on August 28, 2020. Thus, its requirement is applicable in this case.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not comply with that requirement. Furthermore, the trial court has lost competency to conduct further proceedings on this matter, rendering the remand of this matter for additional fact finding an inappropriate remedy. We therefore conclude that we must outright reverse the recommitment order for D.C.B.

Full text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests