Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

By: Derek Hawkins//May 1, 2019//

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

By: Derek Hawkins//May 1, 2019//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District I

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Latrail D. Putman

Case No.: 2018AP1191-CR

Officials: Kessler, P.J., Kloppenburg and Dugan, JJ.

Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Latrail Putman was convicted following a jury trial of first-degree recklessly endangering safety and of arson to a building. He makes three arguments on appeal: (1) the circuit court erred by not granting his motion for a mistrial related to testimony by a law enforcement witness; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to take any action concerning a juror who Putman asserts was sleeping during the presentation of evidence; and (3) the court erred by not “conduct[ing] some inquiry” into the issue of the sleeping juror.

As to the first argument, Putman fails to show that the circuit court misused its discretion when it did not grant his motion for a mistrial. As to the second and third arguments, both are premised on Putman’s contention that the court erred when it found that no juror had slept through the presentation of evidence. Because we do not agree with Putman that this finding is clearly erroneous, we reject both arguments. Accordingly, we affirm.

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests