Sufficiency of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//February 5, 2019//

Listen to this article

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: United States of America v. William D. Corrigan

Case No.: 17-3642

Officials: BAUER, MANION, and BRENNAN, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Sufficiency of Evidence

Following a bench trial, defendant William D. Corrigan (“Corrigan”) was found guilty of four counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Corrigan appeals his conviction, arguing that the indictment failed to properly set out a scheme for wire fraud, and the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction. Corrigan also contends that the district court erred when it ordered restitution in the full amount of the investments. We disagree, and for the following reasons, we affirm.

Affirmed

Full Text

Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event