By: Derek Hawkins//June 20, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Estate of Toni Chee, et al
Case No.: 15-3243
Officials: EASTERBROOK, MANION, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Indemnification
Insurance company obligated to defend interest of estate against medical defendants.
“What we have said so far shows that the duty of indemnity, if any, depends on what happens in the underlying litigation. That makes it inappropriate to try to resolve that matter in an anticipatory action seeking a declaratory judgment, beyond stating the point that neither defense nor indemnity is appropriate in the estate’s suit against Sam. Trying to pin down what duties of indemnity Cincinnati might owe in the other suit under various possible outcomes would be premature. See Panfil v. Nautilus Insurance Co., 799 F.3d 716, 722 n.2 (7th Cir. 2015); Lear Corp. v. Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd., 353 F.3d 580, 583–85 (7th Cir. 2003); Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Reinke, 43 F.3d 1152 (7th Cir. 1995); Travelers Insurance Cos. v. Penda Corp., 974 F.2d 823, 833–34 (7th Cir. 1992).”
Affirmed in part
Reversed and remanded in part