By: Derek Hawkins//March 21, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Roger G. Cocker v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan
Case No.: 15-2690
Officials: POSNER, FLAUM, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges
Focus: ERISA – Benefits – Monthly Payments
It was proper for payment to appellant in retirement to be offset by payments already rendered once appellant initially retired.
“Imagine two employees of Union Pacific, each entitled to the same retirement benefit of $2,311.73 a month. Employee A chooses that monthly benefit to begin at his normal retirement age, while Employee B chooses instead the actuarially equivalent benefits stream of $1,022.94 a month to begin now and thus continue for a longer period. Suppose A and B retire from Union Pacific the same day, go to work for Terminal Railroad the same day, are paid the same salary, retire from Terminal the same day, and were it not for the deduction of their Union Pacific benefits would be entitled by the Terminal Plan to the same monthly benefit of $4000. The plaintiff’s position, echoed by the district court, is that A would be entitled to a monthly retirement benefit from Terminal’s plan of $1,688.27 ($4000 minus $2,311.73), while B would be entitled to $2,977.06 ($4000 minus $1,022.94). That is senseless given the above assumptions about their work history, and is not required by the plan document. The plan administrator permissibly interpreted “payable” to require that the plan’s benefits be offset by the total value of the benefits received by the employee under a different plan; otherwise the plan would be conferring a windfall on an employee who could vary the monthly payments that he received under that other plan.”
Reversed and Remanded