By: Derek Hawkins//July 20, 2015//
Administrative Law
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: BAUER, MANION, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges
Immigration – Removal Proceedings
No. 14-2935 Eugene O. Joseph v. Loretta E. Lynch
Where appellant petition for review of one of several removal orders is dismissed for failure to raise any legal or constitutional questions to the court.
“Until this petition for review, however, Joseph characterized the petition’s approval simply as “new evidence.” We are skeptical about the weight this approval might warrant, since it is the product of only an ex parte review of documents, in this case written affidavits from Joseph and his brother. We need not reach a conclusion about this issue, however, because Joseph never argued to the Board that approval of the Form I-360 constituted an “extraordinary circumstance.” Joseph cannot contend for the first time in this court that the Board overlooked evidence offered in support of an argument he never made. See Khan v. Holder, 766 F.3d 689, 696 (7th Cir. 2014); Cruz-Moyaho v. Holder, 703 F.3d 991, 998 (7th Cir. 2012). As it pertains to our jurisdiction, Joseph cannot make a colorable claim of legal error based on his own omission. Cruz-Moyaho, 703 F.3d at 998.”
Dismissed